|
Post by Capt Anita Thomas on Jul 30, 2020 7:40:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Bubba CMS on Jul 31, 2020 0:30:58 GMT -5
Interesting, Anita. I've never understand all the negative press the drug received. I know a lot of the bad P.R. came from the Lancet article, but that study was discredited. I think it was eventually retracted, but media still spouts its false allegations against Hydroxychloroquine.
|
|
|
Post by Capt Anita Thomas on Jul 31, 2020 11:29:11 GMT -5
I don't get it either, that drug has been around for 65 years.
In the full interview, its about 40 minutes, one of the doctors says, how come, in Africa and Iran (and other countries) it is an over the counter purchase. They also talk about the Lancet article and it was retracted.
|
|
|
Post by Winston Pebbington-Smythe on Jul 31, 2020 16:25:45 GMT -5
Quite honestly, I am surprised you are still getting it to play. They took this off Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and probably several others because they claimed it carried false information that could lead to injury. I don't know about you, but unless my Doctor is going to prescribe the drug, I don't know how I or anyone else is going to get their hands on it.
I don't understand this world we live in anymore!
|
|
|
Post by Bubba CMS on Aug 1, 2020 0:02:41 GMT -5
Even if someone were able to access the drug (here in the States) without a prescription, I certainly wouldn't advocate people self-medicating. But if you and your physician understand the risks, and your doctor is willing to prescribe it for you, why wouldn't you want to try it? I certainly would! If I'm sick, and there is a chance the drug will cure me, I'm all in!
|
|
|
Post by Capt Anita Thomas on Aug 1, 2020 12:48:33 GMT -5
Here is the full interview. www.bitchute.com/video/Bzuf4IRMagOw/I find the statement you just repeated from others disturbing. Add Google, DTube, and Youtube, to that list. Censorship. IF they are so concerned about false information, why don't they just prove it false, and let people decide (there are a lot of smart people out there), instead they are hunting down this information, when ever it pops up so they can delete it. Which bring another question, who is deleting it, you mentioned different companies? Are they all connected in some ways? Or is there control from higher above? And if so who is this 'higher above'? Might it have something to do with money, follow the money, who is going to profit? Why do they care if there is "mis-informaiton", freedom of speech means to have freedom to speak, (except hate speech) to express oneself, like by others or not, and visa versa.
How many corrupt stories have come out over the last decade (or hundred years or more), lets look at one, a few car companies, knew there ignition switch was bad, they started electrical fires, a .99 cent part would have saved those lives whose cars burnt with the people it, but they hid the fact and used the cheaper part anyway. That is a crime.
These are doctors, everyday ordinary people, like you and me, who have worked hard, they have no agenda, at least I can't see one, and they are not profiting by saying this. How is sharing information a crime?
|
|
|
Post by Professor Scifire on Aug 1, 2020 14:14:06 GMT -5
I'm right there with all of you!!
|
|
|
Post by Ms Vivian Wu on Aug 1, 2020 16:04:40 GMT -5
I wasn't able to send this to friends because Facebook took it down no sooner than I had found it. I just don't understand their logic with keeping such info from the public.
|
|
|
Post by Bubba CMS on Aug 1, 2020 22:34:34 GMT -5
I am appalled all the major platforms would restrict access to it. And you're right, Anita...who would do it, and why? It's either money or politics driving the decision...or both. If it could help save a life, it's criminal not to make the information available.
|
|
|
Post by Capt Anita Thomas on Aug 4, 2020 8:50:42 GMT -5
It is.
When I think of this, I know its not something I or others would not do, but these "people" who ever they are, they aren't us and we wouldn't do it, but they are definitely doing it.
My neighbour made a comment not to long ago, and that stayed with me.
She said, it seems like there is a separation of people in the world, those who are good and those who are evil. I live in a small community so its easy to see that there is something to her comment.
|
|
|
Post by Sharrel on Aug 5, 2020 20:53:59 GMT -5
I have been on hydroxychloroquine for about 20 years. I really wish it did have a positive effect on corona virus. It would be nice if just for one a side effect was positive for a change rather than ranging from annoying like a sun allergy (I can live with that Scotland doesn’t get much sun) to the more serious of you might go blind, your kidneys might pack up and your heart rate might go up dramatically).
As much as I really, really want it to be true I doubt it is. A couple of large scale clinical trials were pulled when death rates actually went up.
It really wouldn’t be safe for people to self medicate, there are risks and side effects particularly when mixing with other drugs.
I really don’t get the hype of hydroxychloroquine when they have a steroid (dexamethasone) which has now been proven to be effective in treating Covid 19. It is now the standard treatment in the UK for Covid patients combined with antivirals.
|
|
|
Post by Bubba CMS on Aug 6, 2020 0:53:16 GMT -5
I think one of the blaring issues that Anita raises is the widespread censoring of any positive information regarding the drug. All of the studies I've read so far have involved patients of advanced age, with additional underlying conditions, who are in a moderate to advanced stage of Covid 19. They already have multiple strikes against them, hence the poor outcomes. And the dosages administered are exceptionally high, leading to the toxicity problems. This new group of doctors on the front lines, are experiencing positive results, maybe due to their patients being younger and not as compromised. And even if their results are anecdotal, why censor them? If people can benefit...given the proper circumstances and conditions...why not let the information be shared?
|
|